Real estate transactions, due to their nature and the volume of funds involved, require a series of protocols and notifications to guarantee transparency and safeguard the interests of all parties. One of these protocols is the broker's obligation to inform the parties involved about the price and terms of the sale. However, what happens if this notification is not given directly by the broker?

Stage

Ralph, a salesman, successfully concluded a real estate transaction. At the closing of the operation, you received a closing statement from the entity in charge of the escrow (Escrow Statement), but after 2 months, he had not received any notification from his broker, Bill, informing him about the sale price and the terms of the operation. This raises an important question: Is Bill violating the licensing law by not sending a notice?

The Solution to Uncertainty

The answer is clear and direct: No, Bill has not broken the law. Although it is true that the broker has the responsibility of notifying the buyer and the seller within 1 month after transaction closing, the Escrow Statement provided by the entity in charge of the trust (escrow) meets this requirement according to BPC 10141. This means that the Escrow Statement It is considered sufficient notification and, therefore, it is not necessary for the broker to issue additional notification.

Final reflection

The world of real estate transactions can be complex and full of details. Notifications play a crucial role in keeping parties informed and ensuring compliance with procedures. However, it is essential to know and understand the exceptions and alternatives, as in the case of Ralph and Bill, where an escrow statement (Escrow Statement) can replace a direct notification from the broker. The clarity and knowledge of these protocols ensure more transparent and smooth transactions.